As economic conditions toughen, Dave Broadbent, a licensed insolvency practitioner from insolvencypractitioners.co.uk looks at the range of restructuring options available following a winding up petition.

How long does it take for a court hearing after receiving a winding up petition?

The window between receiving a winding up petition and the date of the court hearing is typically eight weeks. This window narrows further once the petition is advertised in The Gazette. The date of the petition also carries significance as it is used as a reference point against which certain transactions may be examined and challenged in any subsequent insolvency process.

Eight weeks is a limited period in which to assess options, take advice, and initiate a formal procedure. Early engagement with a licensed insolvency practitioner is the single most important factor in determining which routes remain open.

What are your restructuring options following a winding up petition?

Several formal restructuring procedures remain available following a winding up petition. Which is the most appropriate depends on the company’s circumstances and, critically, how quickly action is taken.

In each case, a licensed insolvency practitioner plays an essential role; assessing what remains viable, advising on the right course of action, and steering the process in the best interests of all parties, including creditors.

Company administration

Administration places the company under the control of a licensed insolvency practitioner appointed as administrator. Its defining feature in the context of a winding up petition is the statutory moratorium; a legal stay on creditor action that includes suspension of the petition.

Under the Insolvency Act 1986, the administrator pursues one of three statutory purposes:

1. rescuing the company as a going concern
2. achieving a better outcome for creditors than immediate liquidation would produce
3. or realising assets for secured or preferential creditors

Administration can be entered by court order or, in many circumstances, by out-of-court appointment. However, where a winding up petition has already been presented, the out-of-court route is no longer available to directors.

Administration is most appropriate where the company has viable operations or assets that can be better realised through a managed process, rather than through immediate liquidation. The moratorium creates the conditions under which a sale as a going concern, or a CVA, can be properly pursued.

Company voluntary arrangement (CVA)

A Company voluntary arrangement (CVA) is a formal, legally binding agreement to repay a proportion of unsecured debt over a fixed period — typically three to five years — while the company continues to trade. Approval requires creditors holding at least 75% of unsecured debt by value.

A CVA suits companies where the core business is viable, but the accumulated debt is not. The licensed insolvency practitioner acts as nominee and, once approved, as supervisor, assessing whether the numbers support a credible proposal, structuring it to secure creditor approval, and overseeing its implementation. Their involvement is what gives the arrangement credibility with creditors, such as with HMRC.

Creditors’ voluntary liquidation (CVL)

A creditors’ voluntary liquidation (CVL) is a formal winding up initiated by the company’s directors and it is a distinct procedure from compulsory liquidation.

Entering a CVL before a winding up order is granted allows directors to retain control over the process, including the choice of licensed insolvency practitioner as liquidator. A CVL is generally more orderly than compulsory liquidation, typically producing better outcomes for creditors as assets are realised in a managed way, the liquidator is appointed without delay, and the costs of an Official Receiver are avoided. Where rescue or restructuring is not achievable, a CVL provides a structured exit.

Summary

The appropriate route depends on whether the business is viable as a going concern, the nature and value of its assets, the level of creditor support available, and where the company sits in the petition timeline. These are not assessments directors or creditors should make without input from an insolvency practitioner.

A licensed insolvency practitioner is best placed to conduct that assessment objectively. The options available narrow as the petition progresses — procedures that are usually straightforward to initiate become more complex, more costly, and in some cases unavailable as the hearing date approaches. The earlier an insolvency practitioner is engaged, the more options are available.

A winding up petition is not a conclusion, as there may be options available that better serve creditors, preserve more value, and give directors a meaningful role in the outcome. Which procedure is appropriate is a question for a licensed insolvency practitioner, and one that should be addressed promptly.

About the author

Dave Broadbent is a licensed Insolvency Practitioner, part of insolvencypractitioners.co.uk, a leading directory of licensed Insolvency Practitioners. Backed by the UK’s largest insolvency network, the directory provides fast and easy access to local licensed Insolvency Practitioners with sector expertise.

See also

Place an insolvency notice

What is an insolvency practitioner?

Can you challenge a winding up petition?

Find out more

Insolvency Act 1986 (Legislation)

Images

Adobe Stock

Publication date

5 May 2026

Any opinion expressed in this article is that of the author and the author alone, and does not necessarily represent that of The Gazette.