IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

CASE NO: 2950 of 2017

BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURT IN MANCHESTER

INSOLVENCY AND COMPANIES LIST (CHD)

AND IN THE MATTER OF THE INSOLVENCY ACT 1986

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to a block transfer order of insolvency cases dated 24 October 2017 it has been ordered that:

Rachel Ballinger (“Outgoing Officeholder”) be removed from office in respect of each of the cases listed in the below Schedule (“the Schedule”) (“Block Transfer Cases”) from the date of the order.

Amie Johnson and Sajid Sattar be appointed as joint replacement officeholders in respect of each of the Block Transfer Cases listed in Part 1 of the Schedule.

Amie Johnson be appointed as joint replacement officeholder in respect of each of the Block Transfer Cases listed in Part 2 of the Schedule.

Sajid Sattar be appointed as sole replacement officeholder in respect of each of the Block Transfer Cases listed in Part 3 of the Schedule from the date of the order.

Sajid Sattar be appointed as joint replacement officeholder in respect of each of the Block Transfer Cases listed in Part 4 of the Schedule from the date of the order.

The creditors in each of the Block Transfer Cases listed in the Schedule be notified of the order by advertisement in the London Gazette within 14 days of the date of the order and at the time of the next statutory reporting requirement for each case.

Any creditor in respect of any of the companies or persons listed in the Schedule who has an objection to this order shall have 28 days from the date of this advertisement to apply to court to set aside or vary the terms of this order. Such application shall not affect the transfer of the Block Transfer Cases listed in the Schedule until further or other order by the court.

The Outgoing Officeholder shall receive her release as liquidator, trustee in bankruptcy and company voluntary arrangement supervisor respectively 28 days after the giving of notice to creditors in accordance with this order, save that such release may be subject to further order in the event of an application by any creditor under the above paragraph order for the specific case subject to that application.

SCHEDULE